If you have any familiarity with higher education, you have some idea of luminary theorists Vincent Tinto and Alexander Astin. Tinto’s groundbreaking research on student retention has significantly shaped our understanding of why students drop out of higher education. Among other factors, Tinto identifies academic difficulty and a disconnection from the educational community, also identified as social integration, as reasons students drop out. Additionally, Astin’s seminal Input-Environment-Output model provides a framework for understanding the dynamics of student development and academic success. His model suggests ‘Input’ factors, such as student demographics and prior educational experiences, interact with the ‘Environment,’ which includes educational settings and resources, to produce ‘Output,’ or educational outcomes and student success. Higher education has historically grappled with these issues, and it still does today. I think that Equitable Access course materials intervention models have the potential to mitigate the issues of which Astin and Tinto have made us aware. I thought it would be interesting for us to explore the connections between Tinto’s drop out factors, Astin’s I-E-O model, and Equitable Access.

Equitable Access

Let’s start with how I understand Equitable Access course materials intervention models. Equitable Access is a revolutionary course materials intervention model that standardizes the cost of course materials through a flat fee structure, ensuring that every student in every course has immediate access to required materials from the first day of class. By doing so, it aims to level the academic playing field and create a more inclusive educational environment.

Tinto’s Drop-Out Factors

Vincent Tinto’s work has highlighted two factors that contribute to student drop-out:

• Academic Difficulty: Students who struggle academically, sometimes due to a lack of access to required course materials, are at a higher risk of dropping out.
• Disconnection: A sense of disconnection or lack of engagement with the academic community can also lead to retention and persistence issues.

Impacting Academic Difficulty Through Equitable Access

A significant barrier to academic success is the cost of and access to required textbooks and course materials. Students who cannot or do not acquire their required materials are at a distinct disadvantage, which can lead to poor academic performance and, ultimately, attrition.

How Equitable Access Helps Academic Difficulty

By ensuring that all students have immediate access to their required course materials, Equitable Access eliminates or reduces the access and affordability barriers. Institutions that have implemented this model show promising results. For instance, my research on participants vs. non-participants in an Equitable Access model shows a +15.58% difference in course completion rate for participants, and +1% increase in course completion rate in a pre/post study. Additionally, surveys from the University of California – Davis and San Diego State University found more students have their required course materials with Equitable Access than before, more students than not would recommend the Equitable Access program to other students, and a majority of students who opted out of the program did not secure the required materials for two or more classes.

Mitigating Disconnection Through Equitable Access

Tinto identifies a sense of disconnection or lack of social integration as another significant factor contributing to student drop-out. Students who do not feel integrated into the academic community are more likely to leave.

How Equitable Access Helps Mitigate Disconnection

Without having the required course materials, students cannot engage in the classroom, with their peers, or with the course content. They are not able to participate in class, in group assignments, or reference the materials; not to mention the stigma of not being able to afford or acquire the required materials. By creating universal access to the required course materials, students have the required materials for all their courses. This means they can be fully engaged with the necessary resources and state of mind to focus on their studies – not on their lack of resources. Ensuring all students have unimpeded access to their materials fosters a sense of community among students and the classroom.

Synergy with Tinto’s Model

The implications of Equitable Access align well with the challenges identified in Tinto’s research. By ensuring equal access to academic resources and fostering a sense of community, Equitable Access can serve as one approach to combat both academic difficulty and disconnection.

Astin’s Input-Environment-Output Model

Alexander Astin’s Input-Environment-Output (I-E-O) model offers a comprehensive framework that outlines the factors influencing student success in higher education. The ‘Input’ factors incorporate variables like student demographics, academic background, and prior educational experiences. Students carry these factors with them when they enter higher education. These ‘Input’ factors interact with the ‘Environment,’ which is the educational setting, resources, and experiences provided by the institution. This interaction ultimately leads to ‘Output,’ which manifests as a variety of different educational outcomes such as academic achievement, retention, and overall student success. Broadly, Equitable Access can enrich the educational ‘Environment,’ making it more conducive to learning and academic success.

Equitable Access and Astin’s I-E-O Model

• Enhanced Environment: Equitable Access directly impacts the ‘Environment’ component of Astin’s I-E-O model. By making course materials accessible, the Equitable Access removes two of the most significant barriers in higher education – access and affordability. This ensures that all students, regardless of their ‘Input’ characteristics, have equal access to course materials. In doing so, Equitable Access creates a more equitable and inclusive ‘Environment.’
• Improved Output: With an enhanced ‘Environment,’ we can expect a more meaningful ‘Output’ in the form of student success, retention, and academic achievement. Students who have immediate access to course materials are more likely to be engaged in their coursework, participate in class discussions, and perform well in assessments. This can lead to higher retention rates, better grades, and, ultimately, a more successful academic journey. A more meaningful ‘Output’ aligns with my research theoretical lens of Expectancy (Vroom) and Self-Efficacy (Bandura).
• Can Easier Access to Course Materials Improve the ‘Environment’? The answer to this question is ‘yes’. Easier and more convenient access to course materials not only improves the ‘Environment’ but also has a multiplier effect on ‘Output.’ When students are more engaged and faculty can tailor instruction more effectively, the institution as a whole can benefit from higher retention and success rates. This creates a virtuous cycle where improved ‘Environment’ leads to better ‘Output’.

Wrap Up

The challenges of student retention and attrition are complex and require a multifaceted approach – multiple parts of the institution working together. Singularly, Equitable Access will not solve these challenges. However, when used in conjunction with efforts institutions are already using to improve student success, it can be effective in addressing the challenges raised by the work of Astin and Tinto. Course materials interventions, but Equitable Access specifically, are not just about making course materials more affordable. They are about creating an educational environment where every student has an equal opportunity to succeed.

As always, thanks for checking in and I’ll see you next time.

-MM

If you have ever seen/heard me present, one of the most important parts of my presentation is my favorite quote from Lester Frank Ward, “The thing that is rare is opportunity, not ability”. Ward is credited with leading the efforts to make sociology an academic discipline in higher education in the United States. His work also furthered the concept of intellectual egalitarianism. He argued that providing equal access to education was critical to creating a more equitable society and addressing the inequalities of that society. He believed that educational opportunities should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their social or economic standing. It is my opinion and belief that ensuring access to course materials, regardless of acquisition or delivery model, for every student is a partial fulfillment of Ward’s quest for intellectual egalitarianism.

Egalitarianism

Before we can understand intellectual egalitarianism, we need to understand the concept of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism is a social, political, and philosophical tenet that advocates for equality among all people. The concept encompasses a wide variety of theories and movements that support the idea that all individuals should have equal rights, opportunities, and access to resources, regardless of their social, economic, and/or cultural background. Egalitarianism has had a significant influence on social and political movements like the feminist movement, civil rights movement, and LGBTQ rights movements. Essentially, it is the foundation for anyone advocating for social justice and equality.

Intellectual Egalitarianism (IE)

The Ward quote is so poignant for me is because intellectual egalitarianism is the belief that all individuals (read students) have equal potential for intellectual development and the capacity for knowledge and understanding. Furthermore, it suggests that human intelligence is not fixed and with the right opportunities and environment, people (read students) can develop their intellectual capacities. This is obviously in contrast to those who believe that specific individuals or groups are innately superior (discrimination, prejudice, racism) in terms of intelligence or cognitive abilities. Intellectual egalitarianism supports the idea that everyone should have equal access to educational opportunities and intellectual resources regardless of social background, economic status, race, or gender.

Course Materials and IE

As I said before, my belief is that increasing access to course materials for all students is a partial fulfilment of the intellectual egalitarianism Ward inspired with his work. Inclusive Access and other revolutionary course materials intervention models are the manifestation of modern-day intellectual egalitarianism in higher education. These revolutionary interventions aim to provide access to course materials to all students regardless of their social background, economic status, race, gender, or any other identifying characteristic . As these course materials intervention models remove barriers to course materials for students, they fulfill the notion that when equally resourced, all students have the potential for intellectual development and capacity for knowledge/understanding. To support this, I draw on my own research that indicates increased access to course materials can impact student outcomes.

Course Materials and IE in Practice

My conviction, regardless of strength, is insufficient. So, here are a few ways increased access to course materials promotes intellectual egalitarianism in higher education. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but provoke thought:

Reducing Financial Barriers

The historically high costs of course materials have disproportionately affected students from lower economic backgrounds. The impact of high costs has limited their access to necessary educational resources. Inclusive Access, and similar interventions, aim to reduce financial barriers by making course materials more affordable and accessible, thus promoting a more equitable learning environment.

Empowering Underrepresented Groups

Course materials interventions like Inclusive Access can support historically underrepresented student groups like first-generation students, students from low-income backgrounds, and students with disabilities by making course materials more accessible. Increased access to essential learning resources helps create a more level educational playing field. This allows underrepresented students groups to overcome some of the systemic higher education barriers that may otherwise limit their educational opportunities. This may be the mot important aspect of intellectual egalitarianism in higher education because the current “find and acquire” course materials models prevent certain student populations from choosing their preferred major or courses because of the course materials barrier.

Social Mobility

Traditionally, higher education has been seen as a key driver of social mobility. Increased access to course materials can contribute to this by providing all students with the resources necessary to succeed. When students have equal access to knowledge, resources, and course materials, they are better positioned to seek high-paying careers.

Wrap Up

Increased access to course materials creates a more equitable and just learning environment where all students can succeed and contribute to the collective intellectual growth of society. Intellectual egalitarianism is a concept. A goal. Something to strive for. While not everyone will agree with the adoption of an egalitarian model of society, we can all agree that having access to education should not be reserved for those with resources or born into a certain demographic. As course materials stakeholders, we can create a more equitable and level educational experience for all students by ensuring they have access to the requisite course materials and learning resources.

As always, thanks for checking in and I’ll see you next time.

-MM